Saturday, July 23, 2011

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Should cellphones be banned at the school?

Nowadays the cellphones are part of the teenager’s lives, so when we talk about banning the cell phones at the school we are being against the teenager’s life style. But the teenager’s don´t know the problems that the cellphones can bring when using them in the school. However, these problems exist and they are that the teenagers get distracted when they have a cellphone, they can use it for a bad purpose and they get dependent of the cellphone. The teenagers can get distracted at the class because they can chat with another student, and they lose the attention of the class. The other form how the teenager can get distracted at the school is playing something on the cellphone because the cellphone has many applications that keep the teenager distracted all the time. The other problem of using cellphones at the school is that the teenagers can use them for bad purposes like making pranks in the class or watching pornography videos in an easy way. Time after, teenagers can ben dependent of using the cellphone because they get used to using it all the time, and this can make the teenager more aggressive or with a bad behavior when the cellphones is confiscated by some teacher. So those are the three principal problems of using cellphones at the school and why the cellphones need to be banned for the good of the teenagers.

Review

Should (cellphones) be banned the cellphones at the school?

Nowadays the cellphones are part of the teenager’s lives, so when we talk about banning the cell phones at the school we are been(being) against the teenager’s life style. But the teenager’s don´t know the problems that the cellphones can make(bring when) using (them) in the school. However, these problems (exist and they) are that the teenagers wet(get) distracted when they have a cellphone, they can use it for (a) bad purpose and they get dependents(dependent) of the cellphone. The teenagers can wet(get) distracted at the class because they can chat with another student, and they make lost(lose) the attention of the (class)other student who he talk. The other form that(how) the teenager can (get) distract(distracted) at the school is playing something on the cellphone because the cellphone have(has) many applications that keep (the) teenager distracted all the time. The other problem or(of) using cellphones at the school is that the teenagers can use it(them) for bad purpose(purposes) like (making) pranked(pranks) in the class or they can used for watching pornography videos in a(an) easy way. Time after, teenagers can ben dependents(dependent) of using (the) cellphone because they accustom(get used) to use(using it) one all the time, and these(this) can become(make the) teenager more aggressive or with (a) bad behavior when the cellphones is confiscated with(by) some teacher. So that(those) is(are) the three principal problems of using cellphones at the school and that’s way(why) the cellphones needs(need) to be banned for the good of the teenagers.

Monday, July 18, 2011

Should be banned the cellphones at the school?

Nowadays the cellphones are part of the teenager’s lives, so when we talk about banning the cell phones at the school we are been against the teenager’s life style. But the teenager’s don´t know the problems that the cellphones can make using in the school. However, these problems are that the teenagers wet distracted when they have a cellphone, they can use it for bad purpose and they get dependents of the cellphone. The teenagers can wet distracted at the class because they can chat with another student, and they make lost the attention of the other student who he talk. The other form that the teenager can distract at the school is playing something on the cellphone because the cellphone have many applications that keep teenager distracted all the time. The other problem or using cellphones at the school is that the teenagers can use it for bad purpose like pranked in the class or they can used for watching pornography videos in a easy way. Time after, teenagers can ben dependents of using cellphone because they accustom to use one all the time, and these can become teenager more aggressive or with bad behavior when the cellphones is confiscated with some teacher. So that is the three principal problems of using cellphones at the school and that’s way the cellphones needs to be banned for the good of the teenagers.

Writing Activity 6

Write a paragraph where you persuade you reader whether the use of mobile phones for students should or should not be banned at school.

Saturday, July 16, 2011

Correction 1: Comparison between Pizza Hot and Little Caesars



When we talk about restaurants of pizza, we normally think in price and quality of the food. So now I will compare two different restaurants: Pizza Hut and Little Caesars. Both are restaurant of pizza but they are different in so many ways; they have different advertising techniques, different quality of the pizza and different market targets. Pizza Hut concentrates on giving the customer quality and quantity for a price while Little Caesars concentrate on giving the costumer quantity in the less time for a price. But this doesn’t mean that the pizza of one restaurant is better than the other, it is matter of taste. The other thing that makes both restaurants different is the quality of the pizza. Pizza Hut makes the pizza with more care and precision than Little Caesars. I say these because Pizza Hut gives quality and quantity, and Little Caesars gives quantity in less time. So I guess that the pizza of Pizza Hut has more quality than Litter Caesars. The prices of the two restaurants can tell us the target market that they have. We can note clearly that Little Caesars has better prices than Pizza Hut because Little Caesar´s target is the people with not much money. Little Caesars´s restaurants don´t have good esthetic and that’s why they have lower prices. Pizza Hut’starget is people with money. Pizza Hut’s restaurants have good esthetic, a great environment for the family and friends, so they need to charge all these details. Despite this, the two restaurants have good pizzas, it all depends of what you like more and how much money you have.

Review

When we are talking(talk) about restaurants of pizza(,) we (normally) think in price and quality of the food. So now I will compare two different restaurants: Pizza Hot and Little Caesars. Both are restaurant of pizza but they are different in so many ways(,)(;) they have different advertising techniques, different quality of the pizza and different market targets. Pizza Hot(Hut) concentrate(concentrates) on giving the customer quality and quantity for a price while Little Caesars concentrate on giving the costumer quantity in the less time for a price. But (this) doesn’t mean that the pizza of one restaurant is better than the other, (it) is matter of taste. The other thing that makes both restaurants different is the quality of the pizza. Pizza Hot(Hut) makes the pizza with more careful(care) and precise(precision) than Little Caesars(,)(.) I say these because Pizza Hot(Hut) give(gives) quality and quantity, and Little Caesars give(gives) quantity in the less time. So I guess that the pizza of Pizza Hot(Hut) has more quality than the Litter Caesars. The prices of the two restaurants can tell us the target market that they have. We can note clearly that Little Caesars have(has) better prices than Pizza Hot(Hut)(,) because Little Caesar´s target is the people with not much money(,)(.) Little Caesars´s restaurants don´t has(have) good esthetic and that’s way(why they) have a less(lower) prices. Pizza Hot´s(Hut’s) target is people with money(.) Pizza Hot´s(Hut’s) restaurants has(have) good esthetic, a great environment for the family and friends, so they need to charge all these details. Despite this(,) the two restaurants has(have) good pizzas, is(it all) depends of what you like more and how much money you hang(have).

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Comparison between Pizza Hot and Little Caesars


When we are talking about restaurants of pizza we think in price and quality of the food. So now I will compare two different restaurants: Pizza Hot and Little Caesars. Both are restaurant of pizza but they are different in so many ways, they have different advertising techniques, different quality of the pizza and different market targets. Pizza Hot concentrate on giving the customer quality and quantity for a price while Little Caesars concentrate on giving the costumer quantity in the less time for a price. But doesn’t mean that the pizza of one restaurant is better than the other, is matter of taste. The other thing that makes both restaurants different is the quality of the pizza. Pizza Hot makes the pizza with more careful and precise than Little Caesars, I say these because Pizza Hot give quality and quantity, and Little Caesars give quantity in the less time. So I guess that the pizza of Pizza Hot has more quality than the Litter Caesars. The prices of the two restaurants can tell us the target market that they have. We can note clearly that Little Caesars have better prices than Pizza Hot, because Little Caesar´s target is the people with not much money, Little Caesars´s restaurants don´t has good esthetic and that’s way have a less prices. Pizza Hot´s target is people with money, Pizza Hot´s restaurants has good esthetic, a great environment for the family and friends, so they need to charge all these details. Despite this the two restaurants has good pizzas, is depends of what you like more and how much money you hang.